VirusHead

“I think that if Barbara Lee would read the history of Joe McCarthy, she would realize that he was a hero for America.”
- Rep. Steve King R-Ohio said of Rep. Barbara Lee, D-California

‘McCarthy’ comment by Steve King stirs debate
No, Mr. King. Joe McCarthy wasn’t a hero
Congress Rejects Shirek Post Office Honor
House Republicans kill plan to name Berkeley post office after longtime Councilwoman Maudelle Shirek

The 215-190 House vote on Tuesday came after Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, claimed 94-year old Maudelle Shirek didn’t represent American values. King cited Shirek’s support for freeing Mumia Abu-Jamal, convicted for the 1981 murder of a Philadelphia police officer. He later noted Shirek had an “affiliation with the Communist Party,” citing her sponsorship of a Marxist library.
…
A two-thirds vote was needed for passage. Nine Republicans voted yes and 212 voted no; 180 Democrats voted yes and three voted no; and one independent voted yes.
…
“They are living in the days, I guess, of Joe McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover and decided they wanted to defeat a local district matter, and I think it’s outrageous and unconscionable,” Lee said in an interview.

Bob Patenaude, executive director of Berkeley’s Niebyl-Proctor Marxist Library for Social Change, said Shirek was one of many noncommunist liberals who publicly supported the small facility.

“The red-baiting we’re seeing here is ludicrous, to say the least,” Patenaude said.

What’s really strange about this to me is that there would be a big issue over the naming of a Post Office in Berkeley. Aren’t these sorts of votes normally rather pro-forma?

In this case, King (the author Stephen King must be cringing) insinuates that the long-time public servant is anti-American. She does have a bit of controversy in her background, but if a Berkeley P.O. can’t bear the name of a progressive black woman, sheesh.

“The term “McCarthyism” has since become synonymous with any government activity which seeks to suppress unfavorable political or social views, often by limiting or suspending civil rights under the pretext of maintaining national security.”
Joe McCarthy – Wikipedia

McCarthyism is also a specific example of the faulty reasoning of guilt by association – the attempt to discredit an idea based upon disfavored people or groups associated with it. Guilt by association is the reverse of an appeal to authority. In McCarthyism, or the “red scare,” a person, group, or idea is associated in some way with communism, and thus demonized/blacklisted/criminalized. Recent example: previous post on Cindy Sheehan in New York.

According to this reasoning, this is a valid argument:

China is a communist power.
The US is running up a huge debt financing the war in Iraq.
China holds much of our national debt.
Since the Bush Administration is linked to communism through financing, the communists are secretly controlling the Iraq War.
Therefore, America is a commie.
(Some states even call themselves “Red States”!)

McCarthyism itself is only one example of this kind of reasoning, which seems to arise from moral panic or a hysterical need for scapegoats. There are precedents in the Inquisitions and the witch hunts and in most genocidal movements.

It was obvious that hysteria toward the communist threat had easily transitioned into the language of terrorism, but do they really need to revisit all that stuff? Haven’t we learned anything at all? Has no-one noted the fall of the USSR, and communism generally speaking? It didn’t seem to work out the way it was envisioned. I’m not even sure how many Americans understand democracy and freedom or liberty, much less capitalism. Everyone forgets about greed when they make up these ideologies. The economic forces and drives that exist in the global economy today go far beyond Marx and his criticism of capitalism. I’m not sure if there is any economic system today that values all the people.

While there were reasons for identifying communists in McCarthy’s time, and there are reasons for identifying terrorists today, the hysteria comes in at the point in which any person or group can become a target. Often people are targeted simply because they disagree with official spin, or because they become icons for an idea. Under this kind of regime, whistleblowers are investigated more than people who engage in unethical acts and homosexuals blamed for bad hetero marriages. The cultivation of hysteria, the politics of fear, and witchhunting are tools in the kit of domination and suppression.

McCarthy was a thug who ruined many innocent people’s lives.

I wonder why the right feels the need to employ these kinds of weapons.

More Reading (only a sampling)

From the Left
War on the Bill of Rights by Nat Hentoff
Could It Happen Again? by Ruth Rose
The United States of America Has Gone Mad by John le Carré
The New McCarthyism – Bush’s America: For Better or Worse by Johnny Boyd
From McCarthyism to COINTELPRO by Elizabeth Schulte

Balanced View
The Myth of McCarthyism by Thomas C. Reeves

Radical Right
The Myth of McCarthyism by Ann Coulter

Judge uses penis pump during trials. Are you kidding me?

He is accused of using the pump during two murder trials and a civil case in 2003. Jurors claim they heard what sounded like a bicycle pump or blood-pressure pump.

One saw Thompson making some movement “with his upper body and arms”, according to documents filed by the state attorney-general in Oklahoma.

So who gets a new trial? Can you see it? “Well I was convicted of murder one, but I’m arguing that the judge didn’t pay the right kind of attention to the evidence presented to him….”

They’ve delayed hearing the trial of the former judge because of problems with jury selection and a judge who disqualified himself from the case. Couldn’t stop laughing? It’s one of those stories that both horrifies and amuses me. Pathological… and yet funny.

Can they still call it indecent exposure when it’s under the bench and no-one can see? Shouldn’t there be some new kind of law like “serious breach of gravitas”? What a jerk lot of problems this man must have.

CNN.com – Judge orders release of Abu Ghraib photos – Sep 29, 2005

Despite opposition from the White House, photos of detainee abuse must be released. Our “image” is past the tarnish point. Likely content will include the sodomizing of young boys, possibly in front of their mothers.

The American Civil Liberties Union sought the release of 87 photographs and four videotapes as part of an October 2003 lawsuit demanding information on the treatment of detainees in U.S. custody and the transfer of prisoners to countries known to use torture. The ACLU contends that prisoner abuse is systemic.

Meanwhile, as privates and sergeants get prison time, one of the top architects of our current torture policies is actually up for promotion.

Former White House lawyer (current senior Tyco attorney) Timothy Flanigan has been nominated by the president to be Deputy Attorney General. His nomination is up before the Senate Judiciary Committee for a vote right now.

Timothy Flanigan helped develop policies that removed protections for torture and abuse of foreign detainees in U.S. custody, giving policy sanction for the abuses at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, and elsewhere. He was deputy to then-White House counsel Alberto Gonzales.

If the Senate confirms Flanigan, he will be the direct supervisor of ALL federal U.S. Attorneys. With his former boss Alberto Gonzales in the number one spot, the nation’s top two law enforcement officials will have both played important roles in the torture and abuse scandal.

To guarantee a fair and comprehensive review of the full extent of the government’s violation of the rule of law, Congress must demand an independent investigation of those decisions and the officials involved before elevating another top torture official to the second highest law enforcement job in the nation.

Take Action! Urge your Senators to oppose moving forward on the Flanigan nomination unless Attorney General Gonzalez first appoints an outside special counsel for torture prosecutions.

Roberts confirmed 78-22. Democrats were split down the middle – 22 Democrats and one independent joined 55 Republicans to approve Roberts.

Please thank the only ones who tried to prevent what Roberts will do for a lifetime, and read their arguments about why they opposed him.

In other news, The Progress Report today does a much better job of covering DeLay and Blount and Frist, White House opposition to Medicaid for Katrina victims, arctic ice melting, and mistreatment of journalists in Iraq than my half-written post would have.