<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Half Full or Half Empty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/03/28/half-full-or-half-empty/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/03/28/half-full-or-half-empty</link>
	<description>Contagious Thoughts, Mutating as Needed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:43:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vance Harwood</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/03/28/half-full-or-half-empty/comment-page-1#comment-60114</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance Harwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/03/28/half-full-or-half-empty/#comment-60114</guid>
		<description>Heidi -- Thanks for your thoughts on slippery slopes and the link to Eugene Volokh&#039;s article.  It seems that whenever there are multiple groups with diverse motivations and priorities there is the real possibility of one small step significantly disturbing a previously balanced situation.   A political example comes to mind.  The people that voted for Nader in 2000 were making a statement--probably something like a pox on both your houses.   The likely net effect of the Nader vote was the Bush presidency--which I doubt was the 2nd choice of the Nader supporters.   Perhaps the shrewdest thing some Democratic benefactor could do to tip the next presidential election would be to fund a fringe Republican candidate (Tancredo comes to mind) that might wage an independent campaign.  This would draw off a small percentage of the Republican vote that is very unlikely to vote Democratic.  The next Presidential election probably won&#039;t be close, but this would be an insurance policy.   A few millions spent this way would be a heck of a lot more effective than buying more repetitions of TV attack ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi &#8212; Thanks for your thoughts on slippery slopes and the link to Eugene Volokh&#8217;s article.  It seems that whenever there are multiple groups with diverse motivations and priorities there is the real possibility of one small step significantly disturbing a previously balanced situation.   A political example comes to mind.  The people that voted for Nader in 2000 were making a statement&#8211;probably something like a pox on both your houses.   The likely net effect of the Nader vote was the Bush presidency&#8211;which I doubt was the 2nd choice of the Nader supporters.   Perhaps the shrewdest thing some Democratic benefactor could do to tip the next presidential election would be to fund a fringe Republican candidate (Tancredo comes to mind) that might wage an independent campaign.  This would draw off a small percentage of the Republican vote that is very unlikely to vote Democratic.  The next Presidential election probably won&#8217;t be close, but this would be an insurance policy.   A few millions spent this way would be a heck of a lot more effective than buying more repetitions of TV attack ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JollyRoger</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/03/28/half-full-or-half-empty/comment-page-1#comment-59905</link>
		<dc:creator>JollyRoger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/03/28/half-full-or-half-empty/#comment-59905</guid>
		<description>Well that surely settles that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that surely settles that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
