<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indecent Bible?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/05/21/indecent-bible/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/05/21/indecent-bible</link>
	<description>Contagious Thoughts, Mutating as Needed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:07:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scooper</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/05/21/indecent-bible/comment-page-1#comment-74931</link>
		<dc:creator>Scooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 04:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/05/21/indecent-bible/#comment-74931</guid>
		<description>The Bible is so old that declaring parts of it indecent by somebody&#039;s modern standards is ridiculous (and anachronistic). Even more ridiculous is trying to redact out the &quot;bad&quot; parts. One of the things I love about the Bible is that it faithfully records a people&#039;s struggle to be The People of God - so faithfully that not only are their mistakes and misunderstandings left in, so are their attempts to cover them up. I&#039;m particularly thinking of the history in Chronicles which is repeated in a cleaned-up version in Kings. 

Of course, some things get covered up by translation: Most of the New Testament was written in koine (i.e., &quot;pidgin&quot;) Greek. We read, &quot;What am I to you?&quot; where a literal rendering would be &quot;What me you?&quot;

Our Bible is not perfect. But neither our we. Therefore the Bible&#039;s imperfection suits us perfectly. It is a piece of God&#039;s Truth, and makes us look foolish when we lie about how perfect it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bible is so old that declaring parts of it indecent by somebody&#8217;s modern standards is ridiculous (and anachronistic). Even more ridiculous is trying to redact out the &#8220;bad&#8221; parts. One of the things I love about the Bible is that it faithfully records a people&#8217;s struggle to be The People of God &#8211; so faithfully that not only are their mistakes and misunderstandings left in, so are their attempts to cover them up. I&#8217;m particularly thinking of the history in Chronicles which is repeated in a cleaned-up version in Kings. </p>
<p>Of course, some things get covered up by translation: Most of the New Testament was written in koine (i.e., &#8220;pidgin&#8221;) Greek. We read, &#8220;What am I to you?&#8221; where a literal rendering would be &#8220;What me you?&#8221;</p>
<p>Our Bible is not perfect. But neither our we. Therefore the Bible&#8217;s imperfection suits us perfectly. It is a piece of God&#8217;s Truth, and makes us look foolish when we lie about how perfect it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/05/21/indecent-bible/comment-page-1#comment-74880</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/05/21/indecent-bible/#comment-74880</guid>
		<description>What with the long history of editing behind the current Bible, I&#039;d say lets just go for that Gideon&#039;s version with Psalms, Proverbs, and the New Testament books.  Much more humane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What with the long history of editing behind the current Bible, I&#8217;d say lets just go for that Gideon&#8217;s version with Psalms, Proverbs, and the New Testament books.  Much more humane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
