<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Evil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2009/08/18/on-evil/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2009/08/18/on-evil</link>
	<description>Contagious Thoughts, Mutating as Needed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:43:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2009/08/18/on-evil/comment-page-1#comment-77677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=3048#comment-77677</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s it going,

I like your site. I found it through Blogcatalog. I have a debate site that encourages people to express their thoughts and opinions towards controversial topics. I feel as if this is a way where we can have our thoughts and opinions heard. 

I would be honored to hear some of your insight. Also, maybe we can do a link exchange. If you would like to do one, feel free to email me and let me know. If not, your insight on some issues would be appreciated.

This goes for all visitors to this site as well, everyone&#039;s opinion counts!

Sincerely,
Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s it going,</p>
<p>I like your site. I found it through Blogcatalog. I have a debate site that encourages people to express their thoughts and opinions towards controversial topics. I feel as if this is a way where we can have our thoughts and opinions heard. </p>
<p>I would be honored to hear some of your insight. Also, maybe we can do a link exchange. If you would like to do one, feel free to email me and let me know. If not, your insight on some issues would be appreciated.</p>
<p>This goes for all visitors to this site as well, everyone&#8217;s opinion counts!</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2009/08/18/on-evil/comment-page-1#comment-77673</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=3048#comment-77673</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually trying not to take one position or the other, just to point out that it&#039;s difficult to reconcile: &quot;I...feel that the loss of the scene in which evil is visible is itself a new form of evil&quot; with &quot;I’m not saying that evil is some sort of absolute.&quot;  Evil is a judgment, so in some sense its nature is absolute, IMHO.  We are left with the questions of who judges, who gives them the right to judge, etc.  And contemporary critics will always set us to questioning that authority.  It&#039;s how they roll.

So,it seems to me that you&#039;re trying to abstract away the difficulties presented by relativism here by describing evil in vague terms as a one-sided description of a dynamic that most people will concede to be repellant (evil takes delight in the suffering of others) instead of grounding it in the narrative(s) you view (I think rightly) as necessary.  Even in the abstract, though, it is difficult to sustain your position without some sense of an absolute.  Why is it evil to take delight in the suffering of others?

Of course, the fact that there are no satisfying answers to that question doesn&#039;t make the traditional answers to the theodicy problem (which it sort of reflects, in an odd way) any more satisfying.  But that&#039;s a separate issue.  Not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually trying not to take one position or the other, just to point out that it&#8217;s difficult to reconcile: &#8220;I&#8230;feel that the loss of the scene in which evil is visible is itself a new form of evil&#8221; with &#8220;I’m not saying that evil is some sort of absolute.&#8221;  Evil is a judgment, so in some sense its nature is absolute, IMHO.  We are left with the questions of who judges, who gives them the right to judge, etc.  And contemporary critics will always set us to questioning that authority.  It&#8217;s how they roll.</p>
<p>So,it seems to me that you&#8217;re trying to abstract away the difficulties presented by relativism here by describing evil in vague terms as a one-sided description of a dynamic that most people will concede to be repellant (evil takes delight in the suffering of others) instead of grounding it in the narrative(s) you view (I think rightly) as necessary.  Even in the abstract, though, it is difficult to sustain your position without some sense of an absolute.  Why is it evil to take delight in the suffering of others?</p>
<p>Of course, the fact that there are no satisfying answers to that question doesn&#8217;t make the traditional answers to the theodicy problem (which it sort of reflects, in an odd way) any more satisfying.  But that&#8217;s a separate issue.  Not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirusHead</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2009/08/18/on-evil/comment-page-1#comment-77672</link>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=3048#comment-77672</guid>
		<description>Sorry if that sounded a little flippant. I know what you&#039;re criticizing - but I also feel that the loss of the scene in which evil is visible is itself a new form of evil. I&#039;m not saying that evil is some sort of absolute.

It&#039;s not impossible to make ethical judgments - even now. I&#039;d like to get to a place where narratives are part of the process again, so that the stories can be told and heard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if that sounded a little flippant. I know what you&#8217;re criticizing &#8211; but I also feel that the loss of the scene in which evil is visible is itself a new form of evil. I&#8217;m not saying that evil is some sort of absolute.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not impossible to make ethical judgments &#8211; even now. I&#8217;d like to get to a place where narratives are part of the process again, so that the stories can be told and heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirusHead</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2009/08/18/on-evil/comment-page-1#comment-77669</link>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=3048#comment-77669</guid>
		<description>Well, make allowances. I hadn&#039;t written the dissertation yet, and this was still a foreign voice to me. See me drowning at the edges? 

I think I&#039;ve been affected by thinking and writing about viruses and how agency has sometimes been projected onto them, even in scientific/medical discourse.

I don&#039;t know that I can speak to motivations, but I think I see more of the background details that would create a person who is value-neutral pathological - or just broken, twisted and sometimes even remade.

I will say that I won&#039;t back off the will to evil as a specific form of will to power. Intention to harm is present, and lack of any accountability, or even remorse. Effects are all that can really count, but suffering is intensified by intent. Or gloating within a newly-constructed frame.

And yet, it&#039;s all just adjectives to describe it, much as with the holy. It&#039;s a coincidence that has been observed in many cultures.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, make allowances. I hadn&#8217;t written the dissertation yet, and this was still a foreign voice to me. See me drowning at the edges? </p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve been affected by thinking and writing about viruses and how agency has sometimes been projected onto them, even in scientific/medical discourse.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I can speak to motivations, but I think I see more of the background details that would create a person who is value-neutral pathological &#8211; or just broken, twisted and sometimes even remade.</p>
<p>I will say that I won&#8217;t back off the will to evil as a specific form of will to power. Intention to harm is present, and lack of any accountability, or even remorse. Effects are all that can really count, but suffering is intensified by intent. Or gloating within a newly-constructed frame.</p>
<p>And yet, it&#8217;s all just adjectives to describe it, much as with the holy. It&#8217;s a coincidence that has been observed in many cultures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about racism (best posts combined for review) as of August 18, 2009 &#124; Discrimination Law News</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2009/08/18/on-evil/comment-page-1#comment-77668</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about racism (best posts combined for review) as of August 18, 2009 &#124; Discrimination Law News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=3048#comment-77668</guid>
		<description>[...] from the true issues. Let&#8217;s derail such nonsense before their deception takes hold.   On Evil &#8211; virushead.net 08/18/2009 I was re-reading a dissertation exam question, and I was somewhat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the true issues. Let&#8217;s derail such nonsense before their deception takes hold.   On Evil &#8211; virushead.net 08/18/2009 I was re-reading a dissertation exam question, and I was somewhat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
