<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VirusHead &#187; democracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/tag/democracy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom</link>
	<description>Contagious Thoughts, Mutating as Needed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Something good about Palin and the Tea Party Folks</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/07/something-good-about-palin-and-the-tea-party-folks</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/07/something-good-about-palin-and-the-tea-party-folks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlienNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enlightened self-interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paranoia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=3185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to let all the things I could say about Palin&#8217;s speech pass today, and let <a href="http://www.FactCheck.org">FactCheck.org</a> (and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/">Media Matters</a> and <a href="http://pr.thinkprogress.org/">The Progress Report</a>) point out lies and distortions, of which there were many. There was a whole <strong>bunch</strong> of snideness, and even more dishonesty. But&#8230; I&#8217;m on board in one way.</p>
<p>Why? Because there is one thing she said that gives me long-term hope. </p>
<p>She encouraged people to stand up and speak, and if some do, so will others. If there&#8217;s an energy to participate in the democratic process, maybe it will encourage more Americans to do the same. We&#8217;ve become timid and fearful and paranoid about our freedom and our duty as Americans.</p>
<p>Rather than parroting what some leader says, look up your own concerns and issues and the things that make a difference in your life. Really look. Really research. Really think. </p>
<p>And speak&#8230; and work&#8230; and think&#8230; and vote for your interests. And talk to your friends. And clear the air with realism, not paranoia.</p>
<p>Politics is messy &#8211; but democracy allows all to speak. </p>
<p>Update 2/8/10: FactCheck.org&#8217;s analysis: <a href="http://factcheck.org/2010/02/tea-party-fact-checking/">http://factcheck.org/2010/02/tea-party-fact-checking/</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/07/something-good-about-palin-and-the-tea-party-folks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop Big Media Now</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/11/09/stop-big-media-now</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/11/09/stop-big-media-now#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlienNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Ownership Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public airwaves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[take action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/11/09/stop-big-media-now/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Banking on your short attention span, big media is giving it another shot. <a href="http://www.stopbigmedia.com/">Stop Big Media</a> is trying to get the word out.</p>
<p><a href="http://action.freepress.net/campaign/ownership/">Tell Congress not to dismantle media ownership rules!</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Kevin Martin, Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, has been keeping a secret from the American people. He wants to push through plans to remove decades-old media ownership protections. And he&#8217;s trying to do it without public scrutiny.</p>
<p>Senators Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) and Trent Lott (R-Miss.) have introduced groundbreaking bipartisan legislation that would hold the FCC accountable and put the people ahead of Big Media.</p>
<p>Letters like this — millions of them — stopped media consolidation in 2003. Sign the letter and tell everyone you know. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://action.freepress.net/campaign/ownership/">Do it now.</a> Here is the letter default &#8211; you can edit.</p>
<blockquote><p>
I am writing to urge you to support S 2332, the &#8220;The Media Ownership Act of 2007.&#8221; This legislation will ensure that the Federal Communications Commission addresses the dismal state of female and minority ownership before changing any rules to unleash more media concentration.</p>
<p>Nearly 99 percent of the public comments received by the FCC oppose changing the nation&#8217;s media ownership rules to allow a handful of large conglomerates to swallow up more local media outlets. Congress rejected the same changes to the rules in 2003. Yet the FCC is still pushing a plan to overhaul the rules by the end of the year.</p>
<p>This legislation would mandate that the FCC give the public 90 days&#8217; notice before holding a vote on new rules to ensure a full public accounting of the impact of media consolidation before changing the ownership limits. These steps are necessary to preserve diverse local media that meets the needs of our communities.</p>
<p>Diversity is the cornerstone of a democratic media system. Yet research by Free Press found that that while minorities make up 33 percent of the U.S. population, they own less than 8 percent of radio stations and 3 percent of TV stations. </p>
<p>This legislation would create an independent task force to address the crisis in minority media ownership.</p>
<p>Our democracy requires the free flow of local information from diverse voices. Please support the &#8220;The Media Ownership Act of 2007.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.stopbigmedia.com/=act"><br />
More actions from Stop Big Media</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2007/11/09/stop-big-media-now/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. Cheney, Mr. Rumsfeld, Ms. Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/30/mr-cheney-mr-rumsfeld</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/30/mr-cheney-mr-rumsfeld#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AlienNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authoritarian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caymans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defeatists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swift boating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[totalitarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisper campaigns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/30/mr-cheney-mr-rumsfeld/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Cheney, Mr. Rumsfeld, Ms. Rice:</p>
<p>We are America&#8217;s citizens. We are not <a href="http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/cheney_vs_the_d.html#more">defeatists</a>.  We are not <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/29/AR2006082900585.html">pessimists</a>. We are not <a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060830/NEWS07/608300381/1009">appeasers</a>. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hear anyone arguing that the militant anti-USA movements in the middle east are not a threat.<br />
Not &#8220;Dean democrats,&#8221; not anyone.</p>
<p>Many of us simply have come to believe that you back-alley players are the last people in America who should be making decisions on how to deal with that threat. </p>
<p>You seem to escalate the problems. </p>
<p>You and a few others have formed a cabal that has taken over much of our government. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to invoke Nazis and their appeasers, you might want to be pretty careful where you draw those lines. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not only Arab extremists who hate us now. They spell Bush with a swastika or a dollar sign in South America. Take a look at world polls, and ask yourself how the view of our country can have so changed over the course of just a few years.</p>
<p>Here at home, we don&#8217;t appreciate your dishonorable use of the discourse of freedom while you move toward an increasingly fascistic (i.e. totalitarian, corporatist) regime with our own government. </p>
<p>Mr. Cheney, Mr. Rumsfeld &#8211; You&#8217;ve done well for yourselves since the Nixon days, that&#8217;s for sure.  Ms. Rice &#8211; I had hoped for better when I first heard that a black female academic&#8230; well, never mind. None of you lack intelligence. </p>
<p>But your words ring hollow. There is no truth in you. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t stand up and try to tell us about morality and freedom and dreams.<br />
What you&#8217;ve actually stood for has nothing to do with anything like that. </p>
<p>You have pursued aggressive actions in the world at large, and done what you could to destroy the benefits of citizenship at home. You have worked quite hard &#8211; yes &#8211; but only for the interests of big business (yes, especially oil), not for the interests of the American public. You have have rammed through no-bid contracts for your friends. This administration and its rubber-stampers in Congress even allowed insurance and pharmaceutical companies to write legislation. </p>
<p>Hey, we know that we don&#8217;t count as human unless we make at least $200,000 a year. You&#8217;ve made that clear in so many ways.  How about all those accounts in Dubai and the Caymans? Tax giveaways to the rich, and to corporations that appear to have developed a stronger bill of rights than we could ever hope for. The attempted abolition of social security. On and on, and I can&#8217;t bear to think this week about Katrina anymore. The little speeches make me physically ill. What hypocrisy. </p>
<p>Take odds on who&#8217;ll win after Katrina &#8211; the oil industry or the luxury real estate developers. Admit it, you love the smell of crude in the morning. </p>
<p>We know what you stand for. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve broken our trust. You&#8217;ve done little to make us safer while you&#8217;re manipulating us with fear. </p>
<p>Our ports and monuments and other targets are still quite unprotected. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re watching us (in violation of the Constitution) more than you&#8217;re &#8220;protecting&#8221; us. </p>
<p>America stuck our nose into the Middle East with boots on the ground in Saudi Arabia, protecting the tyrannical &#8220;royal family&#8221; &#8211; not democracy and freedom.  We&#8217;ve propped up dictators and pulled down democratically-elected leaders for years. Are democracy and freedom near the top of America&#8217;s list? The evidence suggests we have other, competing, interests. Perhaps we should have a little national pow-wow about what, exactly, those interests really are. </p>
<p>We didn&#8217;t stay with the peace process in Israel, although we probably gave the go-ahead for the recent attacks. (Were those our bombs?)</p>
<p>The face of America to the world used to be the Peace Corps. Not anymore. </p>
<p>What is America known for now?<br />
The carnage of Fallujah.<br />
The torture of POWs and &#8220;detainees,&#8221; many of whom were rounded up randomly for a fee.<br />
Abu Graib. Guantanamo.<br />
The theft of natural resources from other countries.<br />
Diamond-mining pseudochristians rushing toward their apocalypic visions.<br />
Death cults spinning off your lead of hatred, the resurgence of the KKK and others. </p>
<p>Oh, and we do see the <s>camps</s> prisons you&#8217;re building in Texas. Who are they for again?</p>
<p>You tried to make us believe that Iraq was an immanent threat. It was not. The &#8220;pre-emptive&#8221; war was based on lies.</p>
<p>You tried to make us believe that Hussein was tied to 9-11.<br />
Untrue, but you&#8217;re still using 9-11 to try to rationalize our invasion of Iraq.</p>
<p>You &#8220;sold&#8221; us this illegal and unethical invasion of Iraq. Then you banned the media from Fallujah, and after Abu Graib, you banned camera phones from military bases. No more evidence. No more reporting.</p>
<p>Judging from recent events, routine maintenance of the pipelines isn&#8217;t a prerequisite for corporate welfare. </p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;m wondering why clearly-permanent bases are always built on the oil pipeline? </p>
<p>We are not heroes to the people of Iraq. They want us to leave.</p>
<p>In the name of fighting terrorism, you&#8217;ve simply created more reasons for people to become terrorists. Terrorism is a method. We can&#8217;t wipe out terrorism. But we can and should look at why and how people become terrorists. Our ethical and strategic failures to legitimately address the issues of our world have contributed to that process. There are many more terrorists now. </p>
<p>In Iraq, we&#8217;ve simply jump-started civil war. </p>
<p>You said Iraq would be able to pay for the war. Check our national debt. </p>
<p>Another involuntary call-up for Marines&#8230; back-door drafts&#8230;</p>
<p>And now you&#8217;ve started softening us up for Iran. I&#8217;m not defending Iran, but if I were in their shoes, I&#8217;d probably want to have some kind of deterrant against US aggression too. Is Syria next? Endless war is the plan, then? When does the draft start, or are we planning to use the nukes again? </p>
<p>How many of our own will you label terrorists? The last time I checked, the ACLU was on the list!</p>
<p>It has become abundantly clear from your actions (and their consequences) that you have no idea what strategic negotiation is, what collaborative work is, what diplomacy is, how to gather actionable intelligence, how to create alliances. The US has become a throwback.</p>
<p>I wonder if you have a sense of what democracy and freedom even mean.</p>
<p>You have hurt the middle class, the blue-collar workers, the poor. The schools. The environment. The economy. </p>
<p>The reversal of FDR&#8217;s progress has always been a stated goal. The services of a previously rich nation are already being cut &#8211; and our treasury, such as it is now, is being handed to (surprise, surprise) the rich. Should anyone mention this, you accuse us of &#8220;class warfare.&#8221; </p>
<p>Orwellian language aside (does anyone still believe in the truth-value of &#8220;No Child Left Behind&#8221; &#8220;Clean Air Act&#8221; &#8220;Patriot Act&#8221;?), let&#8217;s recall the rallying cry of this administration, the promise of &#8220;compassionate conservatism.&#8221; That demeanor was dropped &#8211; what &#8211; three days after the election? Where is the compassion? Where is the conservatism? </p>
<p>This administration is self-centered, hard-hearted, and wasteful with the resources of this land and its people. It has a fundamental disregard for the value (and values) of this country. We will be paying for the destructive policies of this administration for many, many years and in many, many ways. </p>
<p>Given all this, it&#8217;s not surprising to see you all default to the usual tactics. You&#8217;re backed into a corner now &#8211; tight enough to defend Joe Lieberman! </p>
<p>Your reaction to the people who bring some of our disagreements into the public sphere for democratic discussion is predictable: </p>
<p>&#8220;Swift-boating,&#8221; whisper campaigns, intimidation, blowhard radio liars, the propaganda industry that used to be our free press, and the further corruption and manipulation of our religious communities. All of it. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s next? Disappearings, black bags? Americans don&#8217;t like intimidation tactics. I&#8217;m not afraid of you, despite the fact that you&#8217;ve put the guy who used to be in charge of dissident roundups (and death squads!) in charge of surveillance on the American people. </p>
<p>The things you stand for and represent do not strike me as the best America has to offer to its own citizens or to the world.</p>
<p>How small and select does the crowd have to be for you <em>not</em> to get booed these days? </p>
<p>You do have to answer to your boss. I don&#8217;t think you particularly believe in God or anything like that. I&#8217;m referring to your boss in <em>this</em> world. </p>
<p>In case you&#8217;ve somehow forgotten, that&#8217;s us, the American people &#8211; not that pathetic man in the white house. </p>
<hr />
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/30/mr-cheney-mr-rumsfeld/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crumbs for the Bottom, Banquets for the Top</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/02/crumbs-for-the-bottom-banquets-for-the-top</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/02/crumbs-for-the-bottom-banquets-for-the-top#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlienNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scapegoating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upper class]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/02/crumbs-for-the-bottom-banquets-for-the-top/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What will it take for blue-collar, middle-to-lower suburbia, struggling rural, and working poor to understand that they do not benefit from the policies and aims of this administration? I do not understand how this administration has been able to mislead demographics like NASCAR fans and Southern Baptists into the ranks of the supporters. As interest rates and prices rise, recognition is growing.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another piece of sneaky legislation: Frist has proposed holding a vote to see if estate tax cuts can get through the Senate if they are linked to a modest minimum wage increase. Insidious. The current minimum wage bill would finally grant a little boost in minimum wage (a $2.10 increase over three years, and tips are counted)  &#8211; but only if it&#8217;s tied to <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060802/ap_on_go_co/congress_taxes">yet more welfare for the superrich</a>! </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get excited about his latest incarnation of the estate tax reduction bill unless you and your family are pretty loaded. Most Americans don&#8217;t pay much if anything in estate tax now anyway. Next time you do your taxes, just ask about grandma&#8217;s house (if she has one). But if you&#8217;re really really rich, this is a big payoff. A married couple won&#8217;t pay <em>penny one</em> in estate tax on property unless it&#8217;s worth more than ten million dollars. The <em>very top</em> estate tax rate would fall from 46% to 30%. Another tax break for the people who least need it, more lost revenue for the government that Republicans want to break back to pre-FDR. </p>
<p>Yes, I understand that this kind of bundling is a way to pass things that wouldn&#8217;t otherwise pass, or even see a vote at all. But to combine unlike proposals like this in the same bill means that the public really doesn&#8217;t have a sense of what their representatives are voting for and against. How does a member of Congress, on either side or in the middle, decide how to vote on something like this?</p>
<ol>
<li>
Is it more important to boost minimimum wage for the lower classes, or to oppose additional huge gifts to the upper classes that drastically cut already-dwindling revenues (about <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/01/AR2006080101071.html">$753 billion over the next decade</a>)? </li>
<li>
Is it more important to oppose any minimum wage increase, or to grant buddies and sponsors in the upper classes more favors? </li>
</ol>
<p>Give just a few cakecrumbs to the bottom-level wage earners (be happy with the crumbs), strengthen the class divide (plan the excessively huge banquest of millions of designer cakes), and work to bankrupt the federal services and entitlements at the same time (get rid of any security for the American people) &#8211; nice class warfare (the use of cake imagery is intentional). When do we get  to use the word aristocrats? When do we get to actually say that the class warfare is from the top down, and that the top isn&#8217;t even human, but protected and corporate? </p>
<p>Have a care, Congress. An election is coming up, and Americans are starting to get a sense of priorities again.  What you do and what you are is more and more obvious with every passing day. </p>
<p>Look around the world &#8211; just look. We need real leadership, real ethics, real diplomacy, real intelligence and real planning.</p>
<p>To the party formerly known as Republicans: Don&#8217;t bother with your pitiful claims to empire. Don&#8217;t bother with your Constitutional disregard. Don&#8217;t bother with your gestures toward theocracy. Don&#8217;t bother with your transparent propaganda. Don&#8217;t bother with a staged terrorist attack. Don&#8217;t bother with your hate.  Don&#8217;t bother trying to hide your mother lode of corruption. Don&#8217;t bother with your secrecy, your deceptions, your lies. Don&#8217;t bother scapegoating critical voices. Don&#8217;t bother with a rigged electoral system. </p>
<p>The multiple voices of America will be heard again. We will take back our democracy.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/08/02/crumbs-for-the-bottom-banquets-for-the-top/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Understanding Dawning</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/07/07/american-understanding-dawning</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/07/07/american-understanding-dawning#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlienNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spiritual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChoicePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deceit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnic cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Lakoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helen Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed citizenry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Lay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theocracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/07/07/american-understanding-dawning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We are an optimistic nation, a hopeful nation. Whatever our politics, we hope that our political and corporate leaders value our lives. This is a wonderful thing about America. But it does leave us somewhat open to manipulation, deceit, and betrayal. I think this Administration is disastrous to us in ways that are have been sufficiently transparent for some time but that many people don&#8217;t want to see or believe. </p>
<p>Fellow Americans, I do believe that more of us are beginning to understand. More information will only show how deep the damage goes.</p>
<p>Read, please. Read more. Ask questions. Find out. Pick an issue and find out everything you can about it &#8211; from different points of view. Put together your own ethical judgment &#8211; whatever it is. Become truly informed to your very best ability. Only in this way can we have a functioning democracy again.</p>
<p>Here are a few links to articles that I think are worth reading.</p>
<ul>
<li>Top ten <a href="http://www.alternet.org/story/38467/">power brokers of the American theocracy machine</a>. View income, players, goals.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/07/04/understanding_the_meaning_of_freedom/">George Lakoff on the meaning of freedom</a> (progressives vs conservatives)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-a-palermo/fifteen-things-to-remembe_b_24519.html">Fifteen Things to Remember about Ken Lay and Enron</a>- Joseph Palermo</li>
<li><a href="http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/opinion/14977020.htm">Garrison Keillor on Ralph Reed</a> &#8211; still running for office in Georgia</li>
<li><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0707-29.htm">Bush Thinks he Can Rule by Fiat</a> (Helen Thomas)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.gregpalast.com/senor-blank-o-wins-in-mexico">Victory for Mexican President Blank-o</a> (Greg Palast) &#8211; Election brought to you by ChoicePoint Inc. and the American Republican Party</li>
<li><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13426.htm">How America Lost its Way</a> (Noam Chomsky) &#8211; Defining traits of a failed state: inability to protect its citizens, belief that it is above the law, lack of democracy.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/">Who Owns What?</a> &#8211; Columbia Journalism Review&#8217;s online guide to what major media companies own</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/07/washington/07recruit.html?ex=1152936000&#038;en=7cb9f2c728745f8a&#038;ei=5070&#038;emc=eta1">Infiltration of the Military by Hate Groups</a> &#8211; We&#8217;re training and arming our own terrorists&#8230;<br />
<blockquote><p>Light infantry is your branch of choice because the coming race war and the ethnic cleansing to follow will be very much an infantryman&#8217;s war, he wrote. It will be house-to-house, neighborhood-by-neighborhood until your town or city is cleared and the alien races are driven into the countryside where they can be hunted down and &#8216;cleansed.&#8217; </p>
<p>As a professional soldier, my goal is to fill the ranks of the United States Army with skinheads. As street brawlers, you will be useless in the coming race war. As trained infantrymen, you will join the ranks of the Aryan warrior brotherhood.</p></blockquote>
</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2006/07/07/american-understanding-dawning/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	Recent Posts: <ul><ul><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/03/13/tv-land" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: TV Land">TV Land</a> - Sat March 13, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/16/tanks-on-a-train" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Tanks on a Train">Tanks on a Train</a> - Tue February 16, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/07/something-good-about-palin-and-the-tea-party-folks" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Something good about Palin and the Tea Party Folks">Something good about Palin and the Tea Party Folks</a> - Sun February 7, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/07/person-or-not-a-person" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Person or Not a Person?">Person or Not a Person?</a> - Sun February 7, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/01/10/rewriting-the-jw-implanted-belief-list" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Rewriting the JW Implanted Belief List">Rewriting the JW Implanted Belief List</a> - Sun January 10, 2010</li></ul></ul></channel>
</rss>
