<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VirusHead &#187; presidential election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/tag/presidential-election/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom</link>
	<description>Contagious Thoughts, Mutating as Needed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The First Presidential Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2008/09/26/the-first-presidential-debate</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2008/09/26/the-first-presidential-debate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlienNation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun With Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kissinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate the debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=2181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I had signed up to rate the debates at &#8220;<a href="www.RateTheDebates.org">Rate the Debates</a>,&#8221; because it was billed as getting a jump on the pundits. I was hoping that this would serve as a pulsepoint. I&#8217;m disappointed that the survey was more about the moderator&#8217;s performance than the substance of the debate itself. </p>
<p>Overall, I thought both candidates did fairly well. They both got angry, but held their tempers. They both looked a little silly smiling when they were hearing digs aimed at them. </p>
<p>Neither one of them adequately addressed the economic issues, but I guess that&#8217;s really for a later debate. As a matter of national security, they covered the basics. I thought some of the discussion about foreign relations was the most interesting part of the debate.</p>
<p>I would have liked to have seen them both actually debate a little more rather than just responding &#8211; but Lehrer tried his best to encourage that (and he was a good and fair moderator). It&#8217;s a matter of the format, I think. </p>
<p>Oh &#8211; and I can&#8217;t wait to hear from that old battleaxe Dr. Kissinger. He must be pleased that he&#8217;s still so important despite his many crimes. </p>
<p>Here are a few things that made me halt: &#8220;wait, hold on a second there, stop the train.&#8221; </p>
<p><strong>McCain</strong></p>
<p>1) He kept saying that Barack Obama &#8220;just didn&#8217;t understand&#8221; &#8211; didn&#8217;t understand how to deal with foreign leaders, didn&#8217;t understand the difference between a tactic and a strategy, etc. etc. &#8211; all with a slightly pitying look and a sorrowful shake of the head. I didn&#8217;t count how many times he said or implied it, but this mannerism ran through the whole debate. I can understand how he would try to use the &#8220;elder statesman&#8221; role to his advantage, but I don&#8217;t think this worked. I kept wondering when he was going to complain about those damn kids next door. It didn&#8217;t make him look wise, just old. It was pretty clear that Obama did understand &#8211; better than McCain in many cases &#8211; and I think he was on weak ground with that attempt. </p>
<p>2) He called for the consolidation of regulatory agencies. What, like Homeland Security? Or so that conflicts of interest can become involved in a power monopoly? It&#8217;s not enough that the agencies are riddled already?</p>
<p>3) The invocation of a spending freeze was not wise, and the way he described the way he would handle cuts sounded a bit disastrous to me.</p>
<p>4) He called for 45 nuclear power plants. Not good.</p>
<p>5) He noted &#8211; twice &#8211; that he was not elected &#8220;Miss Congeniality&#8221; of the Senate. That&#8217;s not a good image for him to invoke. Ick.</p>
<p>6) He seemed to think that if we had trained interrogators, they wouldn&#8217;t torture. The documentation that I&#8217;ve seen about the history of torture techniques during this administration doesn&#8217;t suggest to me that training was the only, or the most important, issue. </p>
<p>7) I think he really tried too hard to pull on the heartstrings. It came off as hammy and undermined what I think really might be his authentic feelings on some issues.</p>
<p><strong>Obama</strong></p>
<p>1) He didn&#8217;t mention nuclear power in the first set of remarks on energy, but then later he did add &#8220;and yes, nuclear power.&#8221; Sigh. I just don&#8217;t like the dangers of nuclear energy and its byproducts. </p>
<p>2) I thought he made good points about our standing in the world, but I&#8217;m not sure about the way he characterized 20th-century vs. 21st-century governments. He could have reframed some of the discourse about why America isn&#8217;t trusted within a more robust terminology. </p>
<p>3) I thought that he let too many things &#8220;go.&#8221; I could see where he needed to focus on the things of core importance, but he was almost too reasonable. I wanted to see some of his fire and air, and he was in water and earth mode.</p>
<p>4) I thought he overemphasized the word &#8220;investment.&#8221; I agree with the ideas, but it&#8217;s not a word anyone wants to hear right now.</p>
<p>5) That whole thing with the bracelet was too much. &#8220;I have a bracelet too, and THIS mother said&#8230;&#8221; I know I&#8217;m jaded, but I don&#8217;t want to see two grown men talking about military deaths in terms of bracelets. Really, give me a break. I expected that sort of ooze-fest from McCain, but Obama disappointed me on that one.</p>
<p>The whole thing was fascinating, but I hope they both polish up for the next go-round.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2008/09/26/the-first-presidential-debate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brief thoughts on Presidential Candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2008/01/15/brief-thoughts-on-presidential-candidates</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2008/01/15/brief-thoughts-on-presidential-candidates#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Richardson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Kucinich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2008/01/15/brief-thoughts-on-presidential-candidates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven't been posting on the Presidential race, mostly because the discourse is depressing. The change/experience framing is trite, and I'm already more than sick of it. But here are some random thoughts about the presidential candidates across the board.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2008/01/15/brief-thoughts-on-presidential-candidates/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2004/11/08/a-mandate</link>
		<comments>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2004/11/08/a-mandate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>VirusHead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/covers/?041108onco_covers_gallery2">The New Yorker: Online Only: Cover Gallery</a></p>
<p><strong>Looking for a Mandate</strong><br />Posted 2004-11-05<br />Yesterday, Philip Gourevitch, who covered John Kerry’s Presidential campaign for the magazine, talked with The New Yorker’s Matt Dellinger about how the President is interpreting his re-election, and what we can expect from the next four years. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/covers/?041108onco_covers_gallery2">Listen to it here</a>.</p>
<p>(Thank you Corinne!)</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2004/11/08/a-mandate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	Recent Posts: <ul><ul><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/03/13/tv-land" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: TV Land">TV Land</a> - Sat March 13, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/16/tanks-on-a-train" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Tanks on a Train">Tanks on a Train</a> - Tue February 16, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/07/something-good-about-palin-and-the-tea-party-folks" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Something good about Palin and the Tea Party Folks">Something good about Palin and the Tea Party Folks</a> - Sun February 7, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/02/07/person-or-not-a-person" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Person or Not a Person?">Person or Not a Person?</a> - Sun February 7, 2010</li><li><a href="http://www.virushead.net/vhrandom/2010/01/10/rewriting-the-jw-implanted-belief-list" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Rewriting the JW Implanted Belief List">Rewriting the JW Implanted Belief List</a> - Sun January 10, 2010</li></ul></ul></channel>
</rss>
