{"id":1311,"date":"2006-08-31T17:59:55","date_gmt":"2006-08-31T21:59:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2006\/08\/31\/kudos-to-keith-olbermann\/"},"modified":"2011-03-19T11:17:24","modified_gmt":"2011-03-19T15:17:24","slug":"kudos-to-keith-olbermann","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2006\/08\/kudos-to-keith-olbermann\/","title":{"rendered":"Kudos to Keith Olbermann"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Keith Olbermann&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/12131617\/#060830b\">answer to Rumsfeld<\/a> &#8211; a much more eloquent argument than <a href=\"http:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2006\/08\/30\/mr-cheney-mr-rumsfeld\/\">my own<\/a>. Nicely done, and thank you!<\/p>\n<p><center><object width=\"425\" height=\"350\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/0isbNpCLodQ\"><\/param><embed src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/v\/0isbNpCLodQ\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" width=\"425\" height=\"350\"><\/embed><\/object><\/center><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Feeling morally, intellectually confused?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The man who sees absolutes, where all other men see nuances and shades of meaning, is either a prophet, or a quack.<\/p>\n<p>Donald H. Rumsfeld is not a prophet.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Rumsfeld\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s remarkable speech to the American Legion yesterday demands the deep analysis\u00e2\u20ac\u201dand the sober contemplation\u00e2\u20ac\u201dof every American.<\/p>\n<p>For it did not merely serve to impugn the morality or intelligence &#8212; indeed, the loyalty &#8212; of the majority of Americans who oppose the transient occupants of the highest offices in the land. Worse, still, it credits those same transient occupants &#8212; our employees &#8212; with a total omniscience; a total omniscience which neither common sense, nor this administration\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s track record at home or abroad, suggests they deserve.<\/p>\n<p>Dissent and disagreement with government is the life\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s blood of human freedom; and not merely because it is the first roadblock against the kind of tyranny the men Mr. Rumsfeld likes to think of as \u00e2\u20ac\u0153his\u00e2\u20ac\u009d troops still fight, this very evening, in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>It is also essential.  Because just every once in awhile it is right and the power to which it speaks, is wrong.<\/p>\n<p>In a small irony, however, Mr. Rumsfeld\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s speechwriter was adroit in invoking the memory of the appeasement of the Nazis. For in their time, there was another government faced with true peril\u00e2\u20ac\u201dwith a growing evil\u00e2\u20ac\u201dpowerful and remorseless.<\/p>\n<p>That government, like Mr. Rumsfeld\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s, had a monopoly on all the facts. It, too, had the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153secret information.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d It alone had the true picture of the threat. It too dismissed and insulted its critics in terms like Mr. Rumsfeld\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s &#8212; questioning their intellect and their morality.<\/p>\n<p>That government was England\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s, in the 1930\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s.<\/p>\n<p>It knew Hitler posed no true threat to Europe, let alone England.<\/p>\n<p>It knew Germany was not re-arming, in violation of all treaties and accords. <\/p>\n<p>It knew that the hard evidence it received, which contradicted its own policies, its own conclusions \u00e2\u20ac\u201d its own omniscience &#8212; needed to be dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>The English government of Neville Chamberlain already knew the truth.<\/p>\n<p>Most relevant of all \u00e2\u20ac\u201d it \u00e2\u20ac\u0153knew\u00e2\u20ac\u009d that its staunchest critics needed to be marginalized and isolated. In fact, it portrayed the foremost of them as a blood-thirsty war-monger who was, if not truly senile, at best morally or intellectually confused.<\/p>\n<p>That critic\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s name was Winston Churchill.<\/p>\n<p>Sadly, we have no Winston Churchills evident among us this evening.  We have only Donald Rumsfelds, demonizing disagreement, the way Neville Chamberlain demonized Winston Churchill.<\/p>\n<p>History \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and 163 million pounds of Luftwaffe bombs over England \u00e2\u20ac\u201d have taught us that all Mr. Chamberlain had was his certainty \u00e2\u20ac\u201d and his own confusion. A confusion that suggested that the office can not only make the man, but that the office can also make the facts.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, did Mr. Rumsfeld make an apt historical analogy.<\/p>\n<p>Excepting the fact, that he has the battery plugged in backwards.<\/p>\n<p>His government, absolute &#8212; and exclusive &#8212; in its knowledge, is not the modern version of the one which stood up to the Nazis.<\/p>\n<p>It is the modern version of the government of Neville Chamberlain.<\/p>\n<p>But back to today\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Omniscient ones.<\/p>\n<p>That, about which Mr. Rumsfeld is confused is simply this: This is a Democracy. Still. Sometimes just barely.<\/p>\n<p>And, as such, all voices count &#8212; not just his.<\/p>\n<p>Had he or his president perhaps proven any of their prior claims of omniscience \u00e2\u20ac\u201d about Osama Bin Laden\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s plans five years ago, about Saddam Hussein\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s weapons four years ago, about Hurricane Katrina\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s impact one year ago \u00e2\u20ac\u201d we all might be able to swallow hard, and accept their \u00e2\u20ac\u0153omniscience\u00e2\u20ac\u009d as a bearable, even useful recipe, of fact, plus ego.<\/p>\n<p>But, to date, this government has proved little besides its own arrogance, and its own hubris.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Rumsfeld is also personally confused, morally or intellectually, about his own standing in this matter. From Iraq to Katrina, to the entire \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Fog of Fear\u00e2\u20ac\u009d which continues to envelop this nation, he, Mr. Bush, Mr. Cheney, and their cronies have \u00e2\u20ac\u201d inadvertently or intentionally \u00e2\u20ac\u201d profited and benefited, both personally, and politically.<\/p>\n<p>And yet he can stand up, in public, and question the morality and the intellect of those of us who dare ask just for the receipt for the Emporer\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s New Clothes?<\/p>\n<p>In what country was Mr. Rumsfeld raised? As a child, of whose heroism did he read? On what side of the battle for freedom did he dream one day to fight? With what country has he confused the United States of America?<\/p>\n<p>The confusion we &#8212; as its citizens\u00e2\u20ac\u201d must now address, is stark and forbidding.<\/p>\n<p>But variations of it have faced our forefathers, when men like Nixon and McCarthy and Curtis LeMay have darkened our skies and obscured our flag. Note &#8212; with hope in your heart \u00e2\u20ac\u201d that those earlier Americans always found their way to the light, and we can, too.<\/p>\n<p>The confusion is about whether this Secretary of Defense, and this administration, are in fact now accomplishing what they claim the terrorists seek: The destruction of our freedoms, the very ones for which the same veterans Mr. Rumsfeld addressed yesterday in Salt Lake City, so valiantly fought.<\/p>\n<p>And about Mr. Rumsfeld\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s other main assertion, that this country faces a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153new type of fascism.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n<p>As he was correct to remind us how a government that knew everything could get everything wrong, so too was he right when he said that &#8212; though probably not in the way he thought he meant it. <\/p>\n<p>This country faces a new type of fascism &#8211; indeed.<\/p>\n<p>Although I presumptuously use his sign-off each night, in feeble tribute, I have utterly no claim to the words of the exemplary journalist Edward R. Murrow.<\/p>\n<p>But never in the trial of a thousand years of writing could I come close to matching how he phrased a warning to an earlier generation of us, at a time when other politicians thought they (and they alone) knew everything, and branded those who disagreed: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153confused\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or \u00e2\u20ac\u0153immoral.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n<p>Thus, forgive me, for reading Murrow, in full:<\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said, in 1954. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We must remember always that accusation is not proof, and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law.<\/p>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men, not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate, and to defend causes that were for the moment unpopular.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n<p>And so good night, and good luck.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><center><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/redirect.html%3FASIN=0470044950%26tag=virushead-20%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=\/o\/ASIN\/0470044950%253FSubscriptionId=0EMV44A9A5YT1RVDGZ82\" title=\"View product details at Amazon\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-content\/uploads\/2006\/08\/0470044950.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg\" alt=\"The Worst Person in the World: And 202 Strong Contenders\" \/><\/a><\/center><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Keith Olbermann&#8217;s answer to Rumsfeld &#8211; a much more eloquent argument than my own. Nicely done, and thank you! Feeling morally, intellectually confused? The man who sees absolutes, where all other men see nuances and shades of meaning, is either a prophet, or a quack. Donald H. Rumsfeld is not a prophet. Mr. Rumsfeld\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s remarkable speech to the American Legion yesterday demands the deep analysis\u00e2\u20ac\u201dand the sober contemplation\u00e2\u20ac\u201dof every American. For it did not merely serve to impugn the morality&#8230;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"><a class=\"btn btn-default\" href=\"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2006\/08\/kudos-to-keith-olbermann\/\"> Read More<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">  Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19,17,5,10,3],"tags":[165,2834,2835,2836,2837,2838,454,633,2612,2839,2840,1346,2841,1022,575,2842],"class_list":["post-1311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-armchair-activism","category-alien-nation","category-culture","category-human-rights","category-politics","tag-america","tag-arrogance","tag-claim-to-omniscience","tag-confusion","tag-destruction-of-our-freedoms","tag-dissent-vs-disloyalty","tag-fascism","tag-fear","tag-hubris","tag-intimidation-tactics","tag-keith-olbermann","tag-morality","tag-murrow","tag-rumsfeld","tag-terrorism","tag-truth-to-power"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1311"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1311\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4226,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1311\/revisions\/4226"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}