{"id":519,"date":"2005-03-15T12:26:21","date_gmt":"2005-03-15T17:26:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2005\/03\/15\/halliburton-audit\/"},"modified":"2005-03-15T12:26:21","modified_gmt":"2005-03-15T17:26:21","slug":"halliburton-audit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2005\/03\/halliburton-audit\/","title":{"rendered":"Halliburton Audit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A35138-2005Mar14.html?nav=rss_politics\">Pentagon Audit Questions Halliburton&#8217;s Costs in Iraq (washingtonpost.com)<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown &#038; Root Inc.&#8217;s cost data doesn&#8217;t match its accounting.<\/p>\n<p>KBR reported it had purchased liquefied gas for $82,100, and then spent $27.5 million to transport it!<\/p>\n<p>$1.8 billion in &#8220;unsupported costs&#8221; in a $10.5 billion Army logistics contract that KBR won on a competitive bid.<\/p>\n<p>$100 million in questionable &#8220;costs&#8221; just in one section of the fuel delivery.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The audit summary, written in October 2004 but <em>withheld from public release<\/em> (my emphasis), covers one out of 10 sections from a $2.5 billion contract under which Halliburton was tapped to deliver fuel, fight oil well fires and repair oil facilities in Iraq after the U.S.-led invasion in the spring of 2003. Of the $2.5 billion, approximately $1.6 billion came from Iraqi oil proceeds and the rest was funded by U.S. taxpayers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>We&#8217;re not only continuing to pay them, but the Army is giving them &#8220;performance bonuses&#8221;!!!<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Reps. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.) and Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), who made a summary of the fuel audit public, called on President Bush to release audits for the other nine sections of Halliburton&#8217;s no-bid contract.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;[T]he Administration has withheld these audits from Congress for months, and Halliburton has repaid nothing under this contract,&#8221; they wrote. &#8220;We would like to know when and how you plan to recover the overcharges from Halliburton and restore them to U.S. taxpayers and the Iraqi people.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>Richard Jones, a former U.S. ambassador to Kuwait, acknowledged sending an e-mail in which he pushed for KBR to sign a deal quickly with Altanmia to meet a rising demand for fuel in Iraq. Jones also testified the embassy had received reports from Altanmia officials that <em>Halliburton executives were demanding kickbacks<\/em> (my emphasis). Jones said those reports were passed along to Pentagon investigators. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So how about the rest of the audit, then? Now I wonder, why would Bush be withholding them from the public? Why is this administration so secretive if they are in the right? Can anyone really believe what they say anymore?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pentagon Audit Questions Halliburton&#8217;s Costs in Iraq (washingtonpost.com) Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown &#038; Root Inc.&#8217;s cost data doesn&#8217;t match its accounting. KBR reported it had purchased liquefied gas for $82,100, and then spent $27.5 million to transport it! $1.8 billion in &#8220;unsupported costs&#8221; in a $10.5 billion Army logistics contract that KBR won on a competitive bid. $100 million in questionable &#8220;costs&#8221; just in one section of the fuel delivery. The audit summary, written in October 2004 but withheld from&#8230;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"><a class=\"btn btn-default\" href=\"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2005\/03\/halliburton-audit\/\"> Read More<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">  Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=519"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}