{"id":596,"date":"2005-05-23T13:20:36","date_gmt":"2005-05-23T18:20:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2005\/05\/23\/george-galloway-says-it-all\/"},"modified":"2005-05-23T13:20:36","modified_gmt":"2005-05-23T18:20:36","slug":"george-galloway-says-it-all","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/2005\/05\/george-galloway-says-it-all\/","title":{"rendered":"George Galloway says it all"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This situation with George Galloway is so symptomatic. I applaud him.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It blew up in their faces when they asked George Galloway to testify this week. Republicans and their doting &#8220;news&#8221; channel FOX tried desperately to hang corruption around Galloway\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s neck even before his appearance. Using forged documents and other sources widely regarded as discredited, FOX and the Republicans pronounced Galloway guilty.  ..Remarkably, while Galloway was asked to appear as a means for the Republicans to indict the UN for corruption, Galloway turned their antics on their heads and indicted the Bush administration and the Republican Party for lying and misleading the world into a costly, deadly and illegal war in Iraq and for the atrocities that have flowed from that war.&#8221; &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politicalaffairs.net\/article\/articleview\/1128\/1\/32\/\">Political Affairs.net<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Below are some pertinent clips from Galloway\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s testimony.<\/p>\n<p>To Coleman, Galloway directly remarked:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Now I know that standards have slipped in the last few years in Washington, but for a lawyer you are remarkably cavalier with any idea of justice. I am here today but last week you already found me guilty. You traduced my name around the world without ever having asked me a single question, without ever having contacted me, without ever written to me or telephoned me, without any attempt to contact me whatsoever. And you call that justice.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On the allegations that Galloway met with Saddam Hussein in order to make &#8220;oil deals&#8221; with the former dictator:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;I have met Saddam Hussein exactly the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld met him. The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns and to give him maps the better to target those guns. I met him to try and bring about an end to sanctions, suffering and war, and on the second of the two occasions, I met him to try and persuade him to let Dr. Hans Blix and the United Nations weapons inspectors back into the country \u00e2\u20ac\u201c a rather better use of two meetings with Saddam Hussein than your own Secretary of State for Defense made of his.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;I was an opponent of Saddam Hussein when British and Americans governments and businessmen were selling him guns and gas. I used to demonstrate outside the Iraqi embassy when British and American officials were going in and doing commerce.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On Republican charges repeated on FOX News that Galloway owned oil companies that profited from the UN program:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Now you say in this document, you quote a source, you have the gall to quote a source, without ever having asked me whether the allegation from the source is true, that I am \u00e2\u20ac\u02dcthe owner of a company which has made substantial profits from trading in Iraqi oil\u00e2\u20ac\u2122.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Senator, I do not own any companies, beyond a small company whose entire purpose, whose sole purpose, is to receive the income from my journalistic earnings from my employer, Associated Newspapers, in London. I do not own a company that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s been trading in Iraqi oil. And you have no business to carry a quotation, utterly unsubstantiated and false, implying otherwise.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On the sources for the Republican senator\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s information about Galloway\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s involvement with oil-for-food:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;You quote Mr. Dahar Yassein Ramadan. Well, you have something on me, I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve never met Mr. Dahar Yassein Ramadan. Your sub-committee apparently has. But I do know that he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s your prisoner, I believe he\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s in Abu Ghraib prison. I believe he is facing war crimes charges, punishable by death. In these circumstances, knowing what the world knows about how you treat prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison, in Bagram Airbase, in Guantanamo Bay, including I may say, British citizens being held in those places.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not sure how much credibility anyone would put on anything you manage to get from a prisoner in those circumstances. But you quote 13 words from Dahar Yassein Ramadan whom I have never met. If he said what he said, then he is wrong.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On the Senate\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s secret informants:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Whilst I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m on that subject, who is this senior former regime official that you spoke to yesterday? Don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t you think I have a right to know? Don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t you think the Committee and the public have a right to know who this senior former regime official you were quoting against me interviewed yesterday actually is?&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On the legitimacy of the Republican Senator\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s information:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;You state that The Daily Telegraph article cited documents from 1992 and 1993 whilst you are dealing with documents dating from 2001. Senator, The Daily Telegraph\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s documents date identically to the documents that you were dealing with in your report here. None of Daily Telegraph\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s documents dealt with a period of 1992, 1993. I had never set foot in Iraq until late in 1993 \u00e2\u20ac\u201c never in my life. There could possibly be no documents relating to Oil-for-Food matters in 1992, 1993, for the Oil-for-Food scheme did not exist at that time.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On the forgery of documents implicating Galloway:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;But perhaps you were confusing the Daily Telegraph action with the Christian Science Monitor. The Christian Science Monitor did indeed publish on its front pages a set of allegations against me very similar to the ones that your committee have made. They did indeed rely on documents which started in 1992, 1993. These documents were unmasked by the Christian Science Monitor themselves as forgeries.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Now, the neo-con websites and newspapers in which you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re such a hero, senator, were all absolutely cock-a-hoop at the publication of the Christian Science Monitor documents, they were all absolutely convinced of their authenticity. They were all absolutely convinced that these documents showed me receiving $10 million from the Saddam regime. And they were all lies. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;The existence of forged documents implicating me in commercial activities with the Iraqi regime is a proven fact. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a proven fact that these forged documents existed and were being circulated amongst right-wing newspapers in Baghdad and around the world in the immediate aftermath of the fall of the Iraqi regime.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On the political motivations of pro-war politicians to attack Galloway:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Now, Senator, I gave my heart and soul to oppose the policy that you promoted. I gave my political life\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s blood to try to stop the mass killing of Iraqis by the sanctions on Iraq which killed one million Iraqis, most of them children, most of them died before they even knew that they were Iraqis, but they died for no other reason other than that they were Iraqis with the misfortune to born at that time. I gave my heart and soul to stop you committing the disaster that you did commit in invading Iraq. And I told the world that your case for the war was a pack of lies.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;I told the world that Iraq, contrary to your claims did not have weapons of mass destruction. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to al-Qaeda. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to the atrocity on 9\/11 2001. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that the Iraqi people would resist a British and American invasion of their country and that the fall of Baghdad would not be the beginning of the end, but merely the end of the beginning.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong and 100,000 people paid with their lives; 1600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies; 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever on a pack of lies.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;If the world had listened to Kofi Annan, whose dismissal you demanded, if the world had listened to President Chirac who you want to paint as some kind of corrupt traitor, if the world had listened to me and the anti-war movement in Britain, we would not be in the disaster that we are in today. Senator, this is the mother of all smokescreens. You are trying to divert attention from the crimes that you supported, from the theft of billions of dollars of Iraq\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s wealth.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>On corruption rampant in the US-appointed Coalition Provisional Authority that ruled Iraq after the fall of the Hussein regime that presided over the loss of billions of US taxpayer\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s dollars:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Have a look at the real Oil-for-Food scandal. Have a look at the 14 months you were in charge of Baghdad, the first 14 months when $8.8 billion of Iraq\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s wealth went missing on your watch. Have a look at Halliburton and other American corporations that stole not only Iraq\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s money, but the money of the American taxpayer.<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Have a look at the oil that you didn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t even meter, that you were shipping out of the country and selling, the proceeds of which went who knows where? Have a look at the $800 million you gave to American military commanders to hand out around the country without even counting it or weighing it. <\/p>\n<p>On the fact that US-based oil companies like Condoleezza Rice\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s former employer Chevron continued to deal with Iraq right up to the start of the war:<\/p>\n<p>    &#8220;Have a look at the real scandal breaking in the newspapers today, revealed in the earlier testimony in this committee. That the biggest sanctions busters were not me or Russian politicians or French politicians. The real sanctions busters were your own companies with the connivance of your own Government.&#8221; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>clips<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=596"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/596\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.virushead.net\/vhrandom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}