Browsed by
Category: Consumer

Reject Bush’s Cuts to Public Broadcasting

Reject Bush’s Cuts to Public Broadcasting

Take Action: Tell Congress: Reject Bush’s Cuts to Public Broadcasting

Once again, President Bush is trying to cripple the public broadcasting system by slashing its funding.

I just signed a petition to Congress to reject these proposed cuts, and I hope you will too.

Mr. Rogers would be proud of you.

In 1969, Richard Nixon attempted to cut PBS funding by 50%. A senate hearing chaired by “hatchetman” Senator John Pastori couldn’t push it through as long as there was someone like Fred Rogers to speak for at least some of the reasons that public broadcasting is important.



Safe to Wander and Explore

Safe to Wander and Explore

Not too long ago, I was asked by a publisher if I might consider reviewing a children’s book. We corresponded a little bit and I said I would take a look. If I liked the book, I’d say so, and I’d run it by our little boy as well to see what he thought.

Well, I got the one book, but then I also received two more books directly from the author. They were all signed, with the date, and inscribed to Ben with message “Follow Your Dreams.” Ben was very happy with that, and so was I. Thank you, Stephen!

I opened up Creatures of the Night, and scanned the inside flaps as I normally do. There was a sweet photograph of Stephen J. Brooks holding a cute little girl – I’m guessing his daughter – but this is what send an arrow to my heart:

He has served as a Federal Agent for over a decade and writes to comfort children. He has always escaped into the magical world of word: comforted through poetry and prose alike.

In The Fairy Ball (which was I think intended for ME {smile}), there was more:

Now, more than ever, he sees the need to reassure children. He works to provide them a magical setting where they can escape the tribulations of their environment. Mr. Brooks writes books that provide enchanting worlds where children are safe to wander and explore.

Because this is a set of concerns very close to my own heart, I have to admit that I am predisposed to like the books. And I did like them. He has worked with different illustrators, some better than others. They are written in the kind of basic poetry found in many children’s books. The recurring theme is a child who wanders out to explore and experience a magical place, is able to navigate the environment and find new aspects of reality, and then returns to the mundane protected with a touch of spirit to help and guide them.

Part of the value of such books is to feed the imagination of children so that they can activate ways of seeing differently using their imaginations.

This sort of imaginative “inner space making” has survival value. I have experienced it for myself and I am convinced of the aching need most children have for it. Children who have experienced difficult realities have even more need for this than the more protected children do. This is how we learn to make sense of our experiential worlds and to multiply the possibilities for making our way along through them.

Ben’s favorite was Alexander Asenby’s Great Adventure. The young boy knight rides a dragon through the starry sky, helps a fairy king protect a town from trolls and other frightening creatures, shares in the celebratory feast and rides the dragon home – all the way back through the closet door. As a girl who would hide out in the closet at times, that rang well with me, too.

I also liked the metaphorical scent of lilac that permeated The Fairy Ball. It’s my favorite flower, and it has always made me feel that all was well. Oh, to dance with the fairies in a glen full of lilacs!

My favorite, however, was the one that I had opened first. Creatures of the Night is a bedtime story that opens up a meditative awareness of all the night-time lives that can surround us. The books constructs a privileged viewpoint that sees what no child can see. That in itself is very fun, but the story goes further in that it evokes an almost mystical sense of place in which the child can feel that he or she really is part of it all, belonging to the surrounding world of all the nighttime creatures. Nicely done.

Alas, I am also a teacher, and one who loves poetry, and so I cannot resist making a couple of suggestions for bringing future books to the next level.

If Mr. Brooks would pull more visual texture into the vocabulary, they could become extraordinary books.

It’s a matter of personal preference, of course, but I also think he could rethink the poetry’s meter. If he keeps the basic four-line stanza, the poetry would be better without the extra syllable in the last line. When you read it out loud, it is difficult to decide where the stress should be. I suspect many parents and children stumble there.

The majestic coyote makes his way
Through the woods each night.
He calls his friends to come and play
As he howls in the moon’s bright light.

I would prefer the last line to have the same beat, something like “Howling through the moon’s bright light.”

I enjoyed the books very much and so did Ben. My suggestions here are intended in a spirit of support.

I look forward to reading new books by Stephen Brooks. Writing gets better and better with the right kind of heart, and he has that in abundance.


Woo-hoo John Edwards!

Woo-hoo John Edwards!

Presidential candidate and all-around fantastic guy John Edwards has joined MyBlogLog, and VirusHead is the very blog community that he has joined! Thank you!

I sure would like to see him win the Presidency.

Download The Plan to Build One America (80 pp., pdf) to see some of the reasons why I am supporting John Edwards.

Here is Edwards’ response to the State of the Union Address last night:

The president tonight renewed his call for an economic recovery plan. But the plan he and Congress have offered leaves out tens of millions of Americans who need help the most. This plan would take months to have any impact, and the people I meet everyday on the campaign trail do not have months to wait. These people are hurting now and need this help now. Over the past seven years, typical workers’ paychecks have failed to keep up with inflation, millions of families are facing the loss of their homes to foreclosures, health insurance premiums have doubled, and families are spending $1,000 more a year on gasoline. The State of the Union may be interesting political theater, but until we find bold solutions to the challenges facing the country, we will be stuck with the same old small, Washington answers.

And in the chamber of the House of Representatives where the president speaks, even though this Congress stopped listening to him a while ago, they will still applaud and cheer him. The truth is that Washington is out of touch with what’s happening across the country. Between now and January of 2009, Democrats must stand up to this president, stand up for what’s right, so he does not continue to forget about the middle class in this country.

Read John’s blog to keep up with the latest on issues and doings.

Calling Armchair Activists for Progressive Actions

Calling Armchair Activists for Progressive Actions

Here are some more actions that you can take online. Pick a couple, or do them all!

Protecting Our Common Dreams

Protecting Our Common Dreams

These are just a few of the stories I got in one email from Common Dreams. Here’s the newswire, but email subscription is recommended.

“If we do not act we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.

Can you imagine a trillion? How about the almost 9 trillion of our national debt? How could the $2,000,000,000,000 (2 trillion) that the Iraq War has cost us so far been spent instead? At a cost of less than 200 billion a year – about a tenth of the total war budget – we could eliminate extreme poverty everywhere! What does this say about America’s priorities?

Israel has blocked all fuel supplies to the Gaza Strip, a move that Amnesty International calls deliberate collective punishment. As electricity and fuel supplies run out, and humanitarian assistance is cut off, this may well escalate to a full-blown humanitarian emergency for the entire Gaza Strip.

The organization called for an immediate lifting of the fuel blockade and of other restrictions which have effectively prevented entry or exit of people and goods from the Gaza Strip since Hamas seized control in the territory, in which 1.5 million Palestinians live, in June 2007. … Amnesty International acknowledged Israel’s right to take measures to protect its population from rocket and other attacks by Palestinian armed groups in Gaza, but condemned the Israeli authorities’ decision to cut off the already tightly restricted supplies of fuel, electricity and humanitarian assistance to Gaza’s inhabitants.

“This action appears calculated to make an already dire humanitarian situation worse, one in which the most vulnerable – the sick, the elderly, women and children – will bear the brunt, not the men of violence who carry out attacks against Israel,” said Malcolm Smart. “The rocket attacks should cease, and immediately, but the entire population of Gaza should not be put at risk to bring this about. …“Now, even crucial aid is not allowed to reach those that need it most in Gaza. These measures must be stopped and the passage of aid, fuel and electricity and other basic necessities must be allowed to resume immediately”, said Malcolm Smart.

Corporate sponsored energy programs have taken root in American Universities. So what’s the problem with that?

How about – get this – corporate representatives sitting on governing boards? How about corporate sponsors influencing the direction of research before the funding decisions are made? How about giving away the exclusive rights for commercialization, effectively subcontracting research rather than promoting independent research? How about delaying the publication of research while they scurry for the patents?

“It’s a cheap subterfuge for carbon-emitting companies,” said Merrill Goozner, director of the CSPI’s Integrity in Science Project. “They get the prestige of associating themselves with major respected universities, yet can control the direction of research and get first rights to intellectual property while delaying any finding that doesn’t help the bottom line. Meanwhile, the p.r. blitz surrounding these programs masks the fact that the carbon-emitting industries actually are spending much less on research and development than they did 10 or 15 years ago.”

Between 1998 and 2005, Exxon gave more than $19 million to groups that promoted the idea that global warming was a hoax. Yet beginning in 2006, ExxonMobil ads proudly touted the company’s funding of the Stanford program: “Today an energy company and a leading university share a common goal. The common good.” Another ExxonMobil ad bore the Stanford University seal.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has done a pretty damning study, and they recommend that universities accepting corporate funding adopt policies to protect the autonomy of themselves and their researchers.

There’s a proposal in the works to turn Union Square – the famous Washington Mall site of the Capitol reflecting pool and the Grant Memorial – into a designated protest place. Oh, swell. You can imagine the debate going on.

“This is a sugar-coating effort to conceal the real plan, which is to reorganize the Mall from its traditional venue as the heart and soul of this country’s free-speech protest movement,” said Brian Becker, national coordinator of Answer, an antiwar coalition.

C’mon, you millions! Off to the protest area! You are not allowed around here!

Other noteworthy articles collected at Common Dreams:

MedFICO: New Healthcare Profiling in the Works

MedFICO: New Healthcare Profiling in the Works

I am complete agreement with Jolly Roger’s post Uninsured? Insured, But Poor? DIE, Deadbeat at Reconstitution 2.0, in which he speculates about the ultimate purpose of MedFICO. MedFICO is a new Healthcare Analytics product that assesses healthcare payment risk.

Already, payment history is being gathered from hospitals around the country in order to develop records that will predict “how likely patients will be to pay future medical bills.”

Don’t tell me that this isn’t some kind of a screening process to allow for the disposal of the inconveniently ill among us. Once they die off, why those health insurance CEOs can enjoy pay and bonuses that will make rock stars look like paupers in comparison. Isn’t it way past time to force these heartless, greedy, useless motherf**kers OUT OF an arena that absolutely should NOT be run like a business?

See: The Doctor Will See Your Credit Now:

“If you had a poor score, you could be denied a hospital stay, for example,” she said.

Linda Foley, who runs the Identity Theft Resource Center, also said any kind of medical risk scoring would run into a thicket of federal laws designed to protect consumers. It’s not clear if such a score would be covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act and other credit-related laws that grant consumers the right to see their own credit reports and scores. The information may also be covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which restricts the use of patients’ private information.

The problem we see is: Who is regulating this?” she said. “How do we know it will never be used before treatment?”

Short answer: We don’t, and it will.